How Vericor Fits Into Your Security Stack

Vericor doesn't replace your existing security tools—it fills the critical gap between perimeter defense and irreversible loss. Here's how we compare to (and complement) tools you already use.

The Enterprise Security Stack

Layer 1: Perimeter Defense

Tools: Proofpoint, Mimecast, Microsoft Defender, Barracuda

What they do: Block 99.9% of phishing emails, malware, and spam before they reach inboxes

The gap: The 0.01-5% that slip through cause 100% of fraud losses ($4.89M average)

Layer 2: Security Awareness Training

Tools: KnowBe4, Cofense, Proofpoint Security Awareness

What they do: Train employees to recognize phishing, reduce human error rates

The gap: 73% of breaches still involve human mistakes. Training works until it doesn't.

Layer 3: Control Layer (Vericor)

What we do: Real-time verification before high-risk actions (wire transfers, credential sharing, invoice payments)

When we activate: When employees are uncertain—after perimeter defense fails, when training is forgotten

The result: Gate between security failures and irreversible losses. 3-second verification before $450K leaves.

Layer 4: Pre-Employment Verification

Tools: HireRight, Sterling, Checkr, Accurate Background

What they do: Verify credentials, criminal history, employment history before hiring

The gap: One-time verification at hire. No ongoing verification for external threats (vendor fraud, BEC).

The bottom line: Perimeter defense and training are necessary but insufficient. Vericor is the control layer that assumes both will fail and provides verification infrastructure before irreversible actions.

Detailed Comparisons

Vericor vs Email Security (Proofpoint, Mimecast)

FeatureEmail SecurityVericor
Primary FunctionBlock threats at perimeterVerify actions before execution
When It ActivatesBefore email reaches inboxWhen employee is uncertain
Threat Coverage99.9% of email threats0.01-5% that bypass perimeter
False Positive RateHigh (blocks legitimate emails)Low (only verifies when requested)
Integration ComplexityHigh (MX record changes, inline proxy)Zero (email forwarding only)
Deployment TimeWeeks to monthsSame day
Annual Cost (5,000 users)$50K-$200K$75K validation program

When to use both:

Email security blocks the majority of threats. Vericor catches the sophisticated social engineering attacks that bypass email security by exploiting trust relationships and appearing legitimate. Use email security for volume defense, Vericor for high-value transaction protection.

Vericor vs Security Awareness Training (KnowBe4)

FeatureSecurity TrainingVericor
Primary FunctionEducate employees to recognize threatsVerify threats in real-time
ApproachPreventive (reduce human error)Reactive (verify when uncertain)
EffectivenessReduces error rate by 30-50%Blocks 100% of verified threats
Human DependencyHigh (requires memory, vigilance)Low (automated verification)
Failure ModeFatigue, stress, urgency override trainingVerification always available
Time to ValueMonths (behavior change takes time)Immediate (first verification)
Annual Cost (5,000 users)$25K-$75K$75K validation program

When to use both:

Security training reduces the volume of threats that reach Vericor. Vericor catches the threats that slip through when training is forgotten, ignored, or overridden by urgency. Use training to reduce baseline risk, Vericor to eliminate catastrophic losses.

Vericor vs Background Check Vendors (HireRight, Sterling)

FeatureBackground ChecksVericor
Primary FunctionPre-employment credential verificationReal-time identity/action verification
Verification ScopeJob candidates onlyAnyone (vendors, partners, external actors)
Verification FrequencyOne-time (at hire)On-demand (every transaction)
Threat CoverageInsider threats (bad hires)External threats (BEC, vendor fraud)
Turnaround Time3-7 days3 seconds
Use CaseHiring decisionsTransaction decisions (wire transfers, invoices)
Cost per Check$50-$200 per candidateUnlimited verifications (flat fee)

When to use both:

Background checks verify internal hires. Vericor verifies external actors (vendors, partners, impersonators) in real-time. Use background checks for hiring, Vericor for ongoing transaction verification.

Build vs Buy

Building In-House

18-24 month development timeline

LLM integration, email parsing, risk scoring, UI

$500K-$1M+ engineering cost

3-5 engineers for 12-18 months

Ongoing maintenance burden

Model updates, infrastructure, compliance

Opportunity cost

Engineering team not working on core business

Fraud losses during development

Unprotected for 18-24 months

Buying Vericor

Same-day deployment

Email forwarding setup in minutes

$75K validation program (90 days)

7.5-10x cheaper than building

Zero maintenance burden

We handle infrastructure, compliance, updates

Proven technology

Battle-tested with enterprise customers

Immediate protection

Start preventing losses today

ROI calculation: One prevented $4.89M incident pays for Vericor for 65+ years. Building in-house costs $500K-$1M and takes 18-24 months—during which you're unprotected.

Ready to Add the Missing Layer?

See how Vericor complements your existing security stack with real-time verification infrastructure.